|
|
Write
for Us |
If
you are interested in writing a column for Eldersburg.Net, send
your resume to news@eldersburg.net |
|
| |
|
Chronicles
of E-burg
What 2000 Dead Tells Us
Walter J. Zalis
November 18, 2005
A
few weeks ago, the death toll for the 2½ year old Iraq war
reached 2,000. Of course, this is a tragic figure and bit of conversation,
but it should also be used to put some American minds back on track.
And of course, this statistic affects everyone, including this small
town of Eldersburg. A group of friends of mine who have grown up
here may be on their way across the Atlantic, in the upcoming weeks.
Let’s look at FIVE issues surrounding the figure 2000, that
Americans should address to check back into the reality of the war
at hand.
Issue #1: Looking at the statistic itself: 2000.
Lt. Col. Steven Boylan, chief spokesman for the U.S. military in
Iraq, had much to say concerning this number, claiming that "the
true milestones of this war are rarely covered or discussed…
The 2,000 service members killed in Iraq supporting Operation Iraqi
Freedom is not a milestone." He added "It is an artificial
mark on the wall set by individuals or groups with specific agendas
and ulterior motives."
That’s probably true- realize that. But what about these hard-to-ignore
numbers, AND
Issue #2: 30,000 dead Iraqi civilians,
300 in dead U.S. civilians and contractors, 100 dead British troops,
and over 15,000 U.S. soldiers wounded.
How come we haven’t discussed some of these numbers? Actually,
these numbers have been discussed, just not much by the American
media. Check out a British newscast, perhaps one from Mexico. There
you’ll see images you’d never find on CNN, FoxNews,
or MSNBC: bodies of American soldiers, stories about innocent Iraqi
men, women and children being murdered.
Issue #3: Those Americans saying, “2000?!? Unacceptable!
That’s the limit!! Get our boys outta there!!”
Of course we can’t do that. We’re in too deep. The U.S.
military milestone came as Iraqi election officials announced that
the country's draft constitution won approval in a nationwide referendum.
Add to that, the fact that Al-qaeda has now declared war on the
country, and there is no way the U.S. is simply walking out.
Issue #4: The temptation to compare the 2000 statistic to
the death toll from other foreign wars.
Over 58,000 soldiers lost their lives in the bloody years of the
Vietnam War, and America lost almost 17 times more dead in Korea
compared to Iraq. In neither case did we defeat our enemies or establish
democracy.
We can’t predict whether the U.S. will accomplish its policy
objectives in Iraq. But policymakers should be mindful of the reasons
for U.S. failure in those wars, for Iraq could have disastrous consequences
for U.S. foreign policy.
But, even if the U.S. cannot finish the job in Iraq, this 2000 mark
after 2½ years cannot be compared to those other wars. This
is 2005. We have the technology, the intelligence, and the firepower
we lacked in the jungle. 2000 is probably more than what should
be acceptable, if anything is acceptable.
And finally, Issue #5: Motives that killed 2000.
President Bush recently said the "defense of freedom is worth
our sacrifice…. Each loss of life is heartbreaking. And the
best way to honor the sacrifice of our fallen troops is to complete
the mission and lay the foundation of peace by spreading freedom."
This is the war on terror, correct? It seems the mission has changed
to one of “spreading freedom.” Do we honor the men who
died fighting terror, looking for weapons of mass destruction, and
searching in the mountains of Afghanistan by actually succeeding
with this mission, forgetting about those failures before?
We started out searching for Osama bin Laden and members of the
group known as Al-qaeda. Osama is still at large, and his group
is still running around with dynamite strapped to their chests.
Notice one doesn’t hear the name Osama much anymore though.
While no links were ever found between terrorism and Saddam Hussein,
the war on terrorism quickly turned to the search for the evil dictator.
Sure, it had nothing to do with terrorism, but Saddam had weapons
of mass destruction… we thought. That was a failure too, but
Bush did find the key to his chance at re-election: finishing what
his father started with the capture of Saddam.
So now our motives are to take Hussein’s Iraq and turn it
into a democracy. Senator Dick Durbin, the Democrat from Illinois
said, "The men and women in our military and their loved ones
deserve a clear path to stability in Iraq."
They do need this. If we fail here, do we jump to another mission
that we actually think we can succeed with? It’ll probably
be a mission fighting the next Saddam, a person who will be created
thanks to the war brought to Iraq.
So, realize this: 2000 is just a number. So is 30,000. We can’t
leave. This is not ‘Nam. And this war needs stability, a motive.
I, along with everyone else in American have watched friends and
family travel to Iraq. I urge someone to remind us why it’s
worth it.
Previous Chronicles
of E-Burg Columns by Walter Zalis
July 29, 2005 - The Restaurant
Customers Guide to Etiquette
July 22, 2005 - Ms. Carol's Denny's
Nite Club
July 15, 2005 - Review: The Gyms of
E-burg
July 8, 2005 - Eldersburg falls in
line with Popular Society
July 1, 2005 - The Challenge of Carrolltown
Center
June 23, 2005 - The Streets of E-town:
Is there a Drug Problem?
June 17, 2005 - Graduation? Senior
Week
June 9, 2005 - Not Your Granny's Town
Anymore
|
Eldersburg.Net
E-Mail Newsletter |
|
|
|
| |
| Eldersburg
Area Sponsored Links |
Maryland Mortgage Services
- Home Mortgages, Home Equity Loans, Refinancing, Reverse Mortgages, More from Gold Standard Financial
Maryland Home Remodeling Contractor- Trademark Remodeling provides home remodeling, additions, garages, and more.
SearchCarrollCounty.com -
Carroll County, Maryland Business Directory
Kent Systems
- Carroll County, MD carpet cleaning, upholstery cleaning, ceramic tile cleaning, and emergency water extraction
Advertise Here - Promote your business
on Eldersburg's #1 Web Site! |
|
| |
|
|
|